Why Star Wars prequels are bad?

Why Star Wars prequels are bad?

The prequels’ childish characters are hated (Jar-Jar was objectively terrible) but the Original Trilogy’s childish characters are ignored (If you don’t believe this, re-watch the scenes with Ewoks). Because they’re not as good as the first trilogy, and the expectations were high.

Are Star Wars prequels better?

Both the prequel and sequel trilogies have been remarkably controversial, but for all their flaws the prequels make a better trilogy. This is largely because they at least have a single creative vision behind them, and they do not conduct elaborate and jarring course-corrections.

Why the Star Wars prequels are amazing?

The Prequels built Star Wars far beyond what it originally was. The new concepts like ‘The Chosen One’, ‘The Sith’, ‘Balance in the force’ etc were great. They showed us what the galaxy had been like before, and what the Jedi had once been, and what they’d meant to the galaxy.

Which is the best of the Star Wars prequels?

While Revenge of the Sith is widely regarded to be the best of the Star Wars prequels and was the only one to receive mostly positive reviews from critics, The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones both have plenty to offer, too.

Are prequels worse than sequels?

Objectively speaking, the sequel trilogy are better made films. The sequel trilogy are better produced, better dialogue (no cheesy dialogue), less of a glaring CGI, and have better pacing. It’s no doubt that the sequels technically are better made films. The prequels had so many flaws that are apparent.

Can I skip Star Wars prequels?

Yes. The thing with Star Wars is that most of the films stand on their own. The prequels really didn’t add anything that we didn’t already know. They added more detail to those events, but you hardly need them to enjoy the story, considering that A New Hope came out 3 decades before the prequels.

Which is worse sequels or prequels?

The Star Wars Prequels Take More Risks Than The Sequels In fact, it’s definitely the riskiest Star Wars movie out of both trilogies. And that’s why I love it, and why most fans probably hate it.

Which is worse Star Wars prequels or sequels?

Are the prequels or sequels worse?

Are the Star Wars prequels good Reddit?

So to conclude, the prequels are fantastic in story, in special effects, in music, and in imagery, and they’re pretty good in characters and dialogue too. Not to mention the fact that they have some of the best lightsaber duels and action sequences of the entire saga.

Who is the most popular Star Wars character?

The Best Star Wars Characters Ever, Ranked According To Ranker

1. 1 Darth Vader. There really couldn’t have been a bigger fan favorite than Darth Vader, who’s the poster figure for the tragic villain archetype.
2. 2 Obi-Wan Kenobi.
3. 3 Yoda.
4. 4 Luke Skywalker.
5. 5 Ahsoka Tano.
6. 6 Han Solo.
7. 7 The Mandalorian.
8. 8 R2-D2.

How many Star Wars prequels are there?

The Star Wars prequel trilogy – Episode I – The Phantom Menace, Episode II – Attack of the Clones, and Episode III – Revenge of the Sith – released nearly two decades after the original trilogy concluded in the early 1980s.

Was George Lucas’Star Wars prequel trilogy Really that bad?

George Lucas’ Star Wars prequel trilogy wasn’t critically successful, but some critics really hated Episodes I – III. Check out these brutal reviews.

What came first the original trilogy or the prequels?

The original trilogy was being told first, with the prequel and sequel trilogies coming later.

Who is the most underrated villain in Star Wars?

Some of the most underrated villain in Star Wars appear in the Prequels, antagonists like Darth Maul, Count Dooku, and General Grievous. The Prequels were mostly about evil winning, so the movies needed some great villains— and they delivered in this regard.